Richmond v. State

123 So. 2, 98 Fla. 114, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 1135
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 2, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 123 So. 2 (Richmond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richmond v. State, 123 So. 2, 98 Fla. 114, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 1135 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the *115 judgment herein, alid briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zaremba v. Konopka
228 A.2d 91 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Gaddies v. Trenton Marine Terminal, Inc.
206 A.2d 180 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 So. 2, 98 Fla. 114, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richmond-v-state-fla-1929.