Richmond v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Richmond v. State

123 So. 2, 98 Fla. 114, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 1135

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 2, 1929·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the *115 judgment herein, alid briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the *115 judgment herein, alid briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur Brown, J., dissents.

Richmond v. State, 123 So. 2, 98 Fla. 114, 1929 Fla. LEXIS 1135 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

123 So. 2 (Richmond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related