Richmond v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Richmond v. State

913 S.W.2d 305, 323 Ark. 236, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 54

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJanuary 29, 1996

DocketCR 96-34

StatusPublished

This text of 913 S.W.2d 305 (Richmond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richmond v. State, 913 S.W.2d 305, 323 Ark. 236, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 54 (Ark. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Richard Dalton Richmond, by his attorney, Charles E. Tilmon, Jr., has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Richard Dalton Richmond, by his attorney, Charles E. Tilmon, Jr., has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam order dated February 5, 1979. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

913 S.W.2d 305, 323 Ark. 236, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richmond-v-state-ark-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack