Richmond v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company
This text of 821 A.2d 1246 (Richmond v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kristin RICHMOND, Appellee
v.
PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Charles W. Craven, Philadelphia, for Prudential Property and Cas. Ins. Co., Appellant.
David Gerald Knerr, Michael J. Piosa, Allentown, for Kristin Richmond, Appellee.
Matthew Stephen Crosby, Scott B. Cooper, Harrisburg, for PA Trial Lawyers Ass'n, Appellee Amicus Curiae.
Before CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and LAMB, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Remanded to Superior Court for consideration in light of Prudential v. Colbert, 813 A.2d 747 (Pa.2002). Jurisdiction relinquished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
821 A.2d 1246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richmond-v-prudential-property-and-casualty-insurance-company-pa-2003.