Richmond v. Previte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Richmond v. Previte

55 A.D.2d 860, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15682

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 25, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 860 (Richmond v. Previte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richmond v. Previte, 55 A.D.2d 860, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In proceedings, inter alia, to (1) validate a petition designating appellant Louis Hernandez as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 14, 1976 for the public office of Representative to the United States Congress from the 14th Congressional District, and (2) invalidate said appellant’s petition, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 17, 1976, as, in effect, (1) dismissed the proceeding to validate the said petition and (2) granted the application to invalidate it. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The finding of Special Term, that the designating petition of appellant was invalid because it did not contain a sufficient number of valid signatures, was proper upon the record on this appeal. Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Margett, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In proceedings, inter alia, to (1) validate a petition designating appellant Louis Hernandez as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 14, 1976 for the public office of Representative to the United States Congress from the 14th Congressional District, and (2) invalidate said appellant’s petition, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 17, 1976, as, in effect, (1) dismissed the proceeding to validate the said petition and (2) granted the application to invalidate it. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The finding of Special Term, that the designating petition of appellant was invalid because it did not contain a sufficient number of valid signatures, was proper upon the record on this appeal. Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Margett, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 860, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richmond-v-previte-nyappdiv-1976.