Richmond v. Levin
This text of 5 Conn. Super. Ct. 380 (Richmond v. Levin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issues are found for the plaintiff on the second count, which alleges both assault and battery. This determination at the least, entitles plaintiff to nominal damages. Schmeltz vs. Tracey,
The assault and battery are found to have been wanton, and hence, malicious, which requires that an allowance be made in the form of exemplary damages. Maisenbacker vs.Society Concardia,
Compensatory damages are found to be $612.00; exemplary $135.00, making a total of $747.00.
Judgment that plaintiff recover the sum of $747.00 from defendant, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Conn. Super. Ct. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richmond-v-levin-connsuperct-1937.