Richmond v. Colvin
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
SHEILA RICHMOND, on behalf of R.R.,
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 13-817 (CKK) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, acting Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION (December 20, 2013)
On September 20, 2013, the Court ordered the Plaintiff to file her Motion for Judgment
of Reversal on or before November 26, 2013. See Order (Sept. 20, 2013), ECF No. [11]. On
November 26, 2013, the Court granted the Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time until
December 17, 2013, to file her Motion for Judgment of Reversal. See Order (Nov. 26, 2013),
ECF No. [13]. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal was not filed on December 17,
2013. As of the date of this Memorandum Opinion, the public docket reflects that Plaintiff has
not filed her Motion for Judgment of Reversal or a Motion for Extension of Time.
Accordingly, this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of
prosecution.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richmond v. Colvin (Richmond v. Colvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.