Richmond v. Coleman Cable, LLC
This text of Richmond v. Coleman Cable, LLC (Richmond v. Coleman Cable, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND, Appellant
v.
COLEMAN CABLE, LLC, JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (HK) LTD., JIAWEI TECHNOLOGY (USA) LTD., SHENZHEN JIAWEI PHOTOVOLTAIC LIGHTING CO., LTD., ATICO INTERNATIONAL (ASIA) LTD., ATICO INTERNATIONAL USA, INC., SMART SOLAR, INC., TEST RITE PRODUCTS CORP., Appellees ______________________
2016-1773 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00935. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
THEODORE FREDERICK SHIELLS, Shiells Law Firm PC, Dallas, TX, argued for appellant. Also argued by MARCUS BENAVIDES, Benavides Law, Dallas, TX. MARK CHRISTOPHER NELSON, Dentons US LLP, Dal- las, TX, argued for appellees. Also represented by RICHARD SALGADO; KEVIN R. GREENLEAF, Palo Alto, CA. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 9, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richmond v. Coleman Cable, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richmond-v-coleman-cable-llc-cafc-2017.