Richmire v. Neeves

Appellate Court of Illinois

Richmire v. Neeves

182 Ill. App. 77

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 9, 1913·No. Gen. No. 18,322·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 8*—jurisdiction of suit on promissory, notes. Cause of action on promissory notes accrues within the city of Chicago so as to give the Municipal Court jurisdiction where the notes are expressly made payable in that city. 6. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29*—presumption as to jurisdiction on review. Municipal Court held not such a local inferior court that no presumption may be indulged in favor of its jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 8*—jurisdiction of suit on promissory, notes. Cause of action on promissory notes accrues within the city of Chicago so as to give the Municipal Court jurisdiction where the notes are expressly made payable in that city. 6. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29*—presumption as to jurisdiction on review. Municipal Court held not such a local inferior court that no presumption may be indulged in favor of its jurisdiction.

Richmire v. Neeves, 182 Ill. App. 77 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

182 Ill. App. 77 (Richmire v. Neeves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.