Richman v. Shuchman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Richman v. Shuchman

37 A.D.2d 780, 325 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3410

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 780 (Richman v. Shuchman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richman v. Shuchman, 37 A.D.2d 780, 325 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3410 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal and property injuries, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 11, 1971, "which denied their motion to amend and supplement their bill of particulars. Order reversed, -without costs, and motion granted on condition appellant Ruth Rickman submit to pretrial physical and oral examinations if respondent shall demand such examinations upon 10 days’ written notice. In our opinion, under all the circumstances herein, the exercise of a sound discretion and the interests of justice require that appellants be allowed to amend and supplement their bill of particulars upon the condition stated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal and property injuries, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 11, 1971, "which denied their motion to amend and supplement their bill of particulars. Order reversed, -without costs, and motion granted on condition appellant Ruth Rickman submit to pretrial physical and oral examinations if respondent shall demand such examinations upon 10 days’ written notice. In our opinion, under all the circumstances herein, the exercise of a sound discretion and the interests of justice require that appellants be allowed to amend and supplement their bill of particulars upon the condition stated herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 780, 325 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richman-v-shuchman-nyappdiv-1971.