Richman v. Nussdorf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Richman v. Nussdorf

203 A.D.2d 548, 612 N.Y.S.2d 933, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4327

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 203 A.D.2d 548 (Richman v. Nussdorf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richman v. Nussdorf, 203 A.D.2d 548, 612 N.Y.S.2d 933, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4327 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), dated February 19, 1992, which denied her motion for leave to amend the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint to allege a cause of action for negligent assault, as no such cause of action exists in this State. To the extent that the plaintiff sets forth any cognizable cause of action, it is barred by the one-year limitations period for intentional torts (see, CPLR 215). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), dated February 19, 1992, which denied her motion for leave to amend the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint to allege a cause of action for negligent assault, as no such cause of action exists in this State. To the extent that the plaintiff sets forth any cognizable cause of action, it is barred by the one-year limitations period for intentional torts (see, CPLR 215). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.D.2d 548, 612 N.Y.S.2d 933, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richman-v-nussdorf-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack