Richman v. Felmus

8 A.D.2d 985, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7521
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 28, 1959·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—In a stockholder’s derivative action pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County (Action No. 1), the appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion to remove Action No. 2 from the Supreme Court, New York County, to the Supreme Court, Kings County, and to consolidate it with Action No. 1, and for other relief. The motion was denied without prejudice to renewal after the determination by this court of an appeal from an order in Action No. 1 entered January 6, 1959. Appeal dismissed, without costs. We find no reason, in this record, for deviation from the general rule that no appeal lies from an order denying a motion without prejudice to renewal (Blair [986]*986v. Holzberg, 4 A D 2d 674), Nolan, P, J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallman and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richman v. Felmus, 8 A.D.2d 985, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

8 A.D.2d 985 (Richman v. Felmus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haberman v. Tobin
626 F.2d 1101 (Second Circuit, 1980)
Hoover v. Allen
180 F. Supp. 263 (S.D. New York, 1960)