Richman v. Bauerle

172 A. 536, 116 N.J. Eq. 131, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 691
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 4, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 172 A. 536 (Richman v. Bauerle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richman v. Bauerle, 172 A. 536, 116 N.J. Eq. 131, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 691 (N.J. 1934).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Sooy in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Tbenohabd, Passes, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A. 536, 116 N.J. Eq. 131, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richman-v-bauerle-nj-1934.