Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Richman v. Bauerle

Richman v. Bauerle

172 A. 536, 116 N.J. Eq. 131, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 691
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richman v. Bauerle. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 N.J. Eq. 164 →
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 4, 1934·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Sooy in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Tbenohabd, Passes, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richman v. Bauerle, 172 A. 536, 116 N.J. Eq. 131, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 691 (N.J. 1934).

172 A. 536 (Richman v. Bauerle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.