Richman Three Lakes Development Partners, LLC v. Alfonso M. Perez

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 2, 2025
Docket3D2024-0673
StatusPublished

This text of Richman Three Lakes Development Partners, LLC v. Alfonso M. Perez (Richman Three Lakes Development Partners, LLC v. Alfonso M. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richman Three Lakes Development Partners, LLC v. Alfonso M. Perez, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 2, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-0673 Lower Tribunal No. 22-19260-CA-01 ________________

Richman Three Lakes Development Partners, LLC, Appellant,

vs.

Alfonso M. Perez, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Spencer Eig, Judge.

Saible Law Group, P.A., and Brooks Saible (St. Petersberg), for appellant.

Carlos Santisteban, Jr., P.A., and Carlos Santisteban Jr.; Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., and Jeffrey V. Mansell (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

Before EMAS, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ramirez v. M.L. Mgmt. Co., 920 So. 2d 36, 39 (Fla. 4th

DCA 2005) (explaining generally that “a landlord has a duty to protect its

tenants in connection with a vicious dog of which the landlord has

knowledge”); Brooks v. Phillip Watts Enters., Inc., 560 So. 2d 339, 341 (Fla.

1st DCA 1990) (setting forth that constructive knowledge of a dangerous

condition may be shown by proving that “the condition occurred with

regularity and was therefore foreseeable”); see also Universal Beverages

Holdings, Inc. v. Merkin, 902 So. 2d 288, 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“[T]he trial

judge's findings of fact are clothed with a presumption of correctness on

appeal, and these findings will not be disturbed unless the appellant can

demonstrate that they are clearly erroneous.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

UNIVERSAL BEVERAGES HOLDINGS v. Merkin
902 So. 2d 288 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Brooks v. PHILLIP WATTS ENTER. INC.
560 So. 2d 339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Ramirez v. M.L. Management Co.
920 So. 2d 36 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Richman Three Lakes Development Partners, LLC v. Alfonso M. Perez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richman-three-lakes-development-partners-llc-v-alfonso-m-perez-fladistctapp-2025.