Richling v. Rockwood Company
This text of 72 N.E.2d 603 (Richling v. Rockwood Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and case remitted to that court for determination upon the questions of fact raised in that court (Civ. Prac. Act, § 606), with costs to abide the event. There was evidence that plaintiff was a business visitor to whom defendant owed the duty of keeping the premises reasonably safe (Haefeli v. Woodrich Engineering Co., 255 N. Y. 442, 448), that this duty was breached and that plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence (Christensen v. Hannon, 230 N. Y. 205, 208; Tobin v. Ariel Holding Corp., 291 N. Y. 606). No opinion.
Concur: Lottghban, Ch. J., Lewis, Coswat, Desmond, Thacheb, Dye and Finn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 N.E.2d 603, 296 N.Y. 858, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richling-v-rockwood-company-ny-1947.