Richland County Bar Ass'n v. Beilstein
72 Ohio St. 3d 24
Opinion
We have reviewed the record in this case and concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated DR 1-102(A)(4), 6-101(A)(3) and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richland County Bar Ass'n v. Beilstein, 72 Ohio St. 3d 24 (Ohio 1995).
72 Ohio St. 3d 24 (Richland County Bar Ass'n v. Beilstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richland Cty. Bar Assn. v. Beilstein
1995 Ohio 64 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)