Richison v. Nunn

Washington Supreme Court

Richison v. Nunn

377 P.2d 991, 61 Wash. 2d 788, 1963 Wash. LEXIS 505

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 24, 1963

DocketNo. 36321

StatusPublished

This text of 377 P.2d 991 (Richison v. Nunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richison v. Nunn, 377 P.2d 991, 61 Wash. 2d 788, 1963 Wash. LEXIS 505 (Wash. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In Richison v. Nunn, 57 Wn. (2d) 1, 19, 340 P. (2d) 793 (1959), this court held:

“ . . . The plaintiff having failed to sustain the burden of proving that her disability was the result of the defendant’s negligence, the judgment must be reversed.

“It is so ordered.”

The petition for rehearing was denied January 13, 1960. The re-mittitur was filed on January 20, 1961. The trial court thereafter entered judgment of dismissal. From the judgment of dismissal, Roy E. Richison and Vera Richison, his wife, appeal.

The trial court’s entry of judgment of dismissal was in conformity with the decision and mandate of this court.

The judgment is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI