Richey's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Richey's Appeal

14 A. 235, 10 Sadler 395, 22 Week. No. 154, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 978

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 14, 1888

DocketNo. 37

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 A. 235 (Richey's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richey's Appeal, 14 A. 235, 10 Sadler 395, 22 Week. No. 154, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 978 (Pa. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

As the lien of the mortgage was not prior to all other Hens except other mortgages, ground rents, and purchase money due the commonwealth, its Hen was discharged upon confirmation of the assignee’s sale. Nor can we discover any error in the distribution. As by the sale the mortgage was discharged, the money arising therefrom was properly awarded to the mortgagee, in trust for Margaret Bratton.

The appeal is dismissed and the decree affirmed, at costs of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

As the lien of the mortgage was not prior to all other Hens except other mortgages, ground rents, and purchase money due the commonwealth, its Hen was discharged upon confirmation of the assignee’s sale. Nor can we discover any error in the distribution. As by the sale the mortgage was discharged, the money arising therefrom was properly awarded to the mortgagee, in trust for Margaret Bratton.

The appeal is dismissed and the decree affirmed, at costs of appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 A. 235, 10 Sadler 395, 22 Week. No. 154, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richeys-appeal-pa-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack