Richey's Appeal

14 A. 235, 10 Sadler 395, 22 Week. No. 154, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 978
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 14, 1888·No. No. 37·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

As the lien of the mortgage was not prior to all other Hens except other mortgages, ground rents, and purchase money due the commonwealth, its Hen was discharged upon confirmation of the assignee’s sale. Nor can we discover any error in the distribution. As by the sale the mortgage was discharged, the money arising therefrom was properly awarded to the mortgagee, in trust for Margaret Bratton.

The appeal is dismissed and the decree affirmed, at costs of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richey's Appeal, 14 A. 235, 10 Sadler 395, 22 Week. No. 154, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 978 (Pa. 1888).

14 A. 235 (Richey's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pickett v. Gilmer
32 La. Ann. 991 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1880)