Richey v. Axon Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided June 5, 2020·No. 3:19-cv-00192·Unknown

Opinion

KRISTEN L. MARTINI, ESQ. J.CHRISTOPHER JORGENSEN, ESQ. State Bar No. 11272 State Bar No. 5382 LLP State Bar No. 13074 One East Liberty Street, Suite 300 LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE Reno, NV 89501 LLP Tel: 775.823.2900 3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600 Fax: 775.823.2929 Las Vegas, NV 89169 kmartini@lrrc.com Tel: 702.949.8200 Fax: 702.949.8398 cjorgensen@lrrc.com In Association With: bblakley@lrrc.com PAMELA B. PETERSEN, ESQ. State Bar No. 6451 AMY L. NGUYEN, ESQ. (Pro Hac) AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. 17800 N. 85th Street Scottsdale, AZ 85255 Tel: 623.326.6016 Fax: 480.905.2027 ppetersen@axon.com amynguyen@axon.com legal@axon.com Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOUGLAS RICHEY, on behalf of himself and Case No.: 3:19-cv-00192-MMD-CBC all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY v. AXON ENTERPRISE, INC., formerly d/b/a TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant. In order to protect the confidentiality of confidential information obtained by the parties in connection with this case, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Any party or non-party may designate as “confidential” (by stamping the relevant page or as other otherwise set forth herein) any document or response to discovery which that party or non-party considers in good faith to contain information involving trade secrets, or other non- public financial, personal, proprietary, or competitively sensitive information, subject to protection under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Nevada law (“Confidential Information”). Any party or non-party may designate as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” (by stamping the relevant page or as otherwise set forth herein) any document or response to discovery when that party or non-party believes in good faith that (1) the material contains Confidential Information; and (2) good cause exists to permit disclosure only to the attorneys and paralegals for the parties, experts retained by the parties’ attorneys (subject to paragraph 4(d) herein), and the Court, and not to any other person or entity, including the parties or any employee or agent of the parties, except as expressly set forth herein (“AEO Information.”). Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each page on which Confidential or AEO Information appears shall be so designated. 2. A party or non-party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or in response to written discovery as Confidential or AEO Information by so indicating in said response or on the record at the deposition and requesting the preparation of a separate transcript of such material. Additionally a party or non-party may designate in writing, within twenty (20) days after receipt of said responses or of the deposition transcript for which the designation is proposed, that specific pages of the transcript and/or specific responses be treated as Confidential or AEO Information. Any other party may object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the parties shall follow the procedures described in paragraph 9 below. After any designation made according to the procedure set forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures described in paragraph 9 below, and counsel for all parties shall be responsible for marking all previously unmarked copies of the designated material in their possession or control with the specified designation. 3. All information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (other than information that is publicly available) shall be used by the party or parties to whom the information is produced solely for the purpose of litigating this case. 4. Except with the prior written consent of other parties, or upon prior order of this Court obtained upon notice to opposing counsel, material designated as “Confidential Information” shall not be disclosed to any person other than: (a) counsel for the respective parties to this litigation, including in-house counsel and co-counsel retained for this litigation; (b) employees of such counsel; (c) individual defendants, class representatives, any officer or employee of a party, to the extent deemed necessary by Counsel for the prosecution or defense of this litigation; (d) consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of this litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the Certification attached to this Order as Exhibit “A” (which shall be retained by counsel to the party so disclosing the Confidential Information and made available for inspection by opposing counsel during the pendency or after the termination of the action only upon good cause shown and upon order of the Court) before being shown or given any Confidential Information; (e) any authors or recipients of the Confidential Information; (f) the Court, Court personnel, and court reporters; and (g) witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(e)). A witness shall sign the Certification before being shown a confidential document. Confidential Information may be disclosed to a witness who will not sign the Certification only in a deposition at which the party who designated the Confidential Information is represented or has been given notice that Confidential Information shall be designated “Confidential” pursuant to paragraph 2 above. Witnesses shown Confidential Information shall not be allowed to retain copies. 5. Material designated as AEO Information may be disclosed only to the receiving party’s counsel, including the employees of counsel who have direct working responsibilities in connection with this litigation, and the non-party expert witnesses employed by receiving counsel to assist in the preparation and trial of this lawsuit, provided that any such expert is first advised of, and agrees to be bound by, the provisions of this Order and executes a copy of the Certification attached to this Order as Exhibit “A” before being shown or given any AEO Information. Material designated as AEO Information may also be disclosed to the Court and its staff, the author or recipient of the material, or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the material. Material designated as AEO Information shall not be disclosed to any other person or entities. 6. Any persons receiving Confidential or AEO Information shall not reveal or discuss such information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set forth herein. 7. Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior Court order, papers filed with the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a contemporaneous motion for leave to file those documents under seal, and shall be filed consistent with the Court’s electronic filing procedures in accordance with Local Rule IA 10-5. Notwithstanding any agreement among the parties, the party seeking to file a paper under seal bears the burden of overcoming the presumption in favor of public access to papers filed in court. Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.2d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006); Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2010). 8. A party may designate as “Confidential” or “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” documents or discovery materials produced by a non-party by providing written notice to all parties of the relevant document numbers or other identification within thirty (30) days after receiving such documents or discovery materials. Any party or non-party may voluntarily disclose to others without restriction any information designated by that party or non-party as confidential, although a document may lose its confidential status if it is made public. 9. If a party contends that

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richey v. Axon Enterprises, Inc., (D. Nev. 2020).

Richey v. Axon Enterprises, Inc. (Richey v. Axon Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)