Richey v. Alverson
94 S.E. 582, 21 Ga. App. 421, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 616
This text of 94 S.E. 582 (Richey v. Alverson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Richey v. Alverson, 94 S.E. 582, 21 Ga. App. 421, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 616 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
1. Grounds 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the amended motion for new trial are but amplifications of the general grounds.
2. Ground 8 is too indefinite to present any issue for determination by this court.
3. There was evidence to support the verdict.
4. A new trial was properly refused.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 582, 21 Ga. App. 421, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richey-v-alverson-gactapp-1917.