Richemont v. Osias

516 So. 2d 100, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2828, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11408, 1987 WL 2261
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 9, 1987·No. No. 87-1197·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order dismissing the cause for failure to prosecute and remand with instructions to reinstate. It was error to dismiss under the provisions of Rule 1.420(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, because the record reveals sufficient meaningful activity on the part of appellant within the year preceding the motion and order of dismissal for failure to prosecute. Gelb v. Miranda, 456 So.2d 548, 549 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); American Salvage and Jobbing Co. v. Salomon, 367 So.2d 716, 717 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Philips v. Marshall Berwick Chevrolet, Inc., 467 So.2d 1068, 1069 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur. LETTS, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richemont v. Osias, 516 So. 2d 100, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2828, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11408, 1987 WL 2261 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

516 So. 2d 100 (Richemont v. Osias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosa v. Florida Power & Light Co.
636 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Anthony v. Schmitt
557 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)