Richemont v. Osias

516 So. 2d 100, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2828, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11408, 1987 WL 2261
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 9, 1987
DocketNo. 87-1197
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 516 So. 2d 100 (Richemont v. Osias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richemont v. Osias, 516 So. 2d 100, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2828, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11408, 1987 WL 2261 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order dismissing the cause for failure to prosecute and remand with instructions to reinstate. It was error to dismiss under the provisions of Rule 1.420(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, because the record reveals sufficient meaningful activity on the part of appellant within the year preceding the motion and order of dismissal for failure to prosecute. Gelb v. Miranda, 456 So.2d 548, 549 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); American Salvage and Jobbing Co. v. Salomon, 367 So.2d 716, 717 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Philips v. Marshall Berwick Chevrolet, Inc., 467 So.2d 1068, 1069 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur. LETTS, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosa v. Florida Power & Light Co.
636 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Anthony v. Schmitt
557 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 So. 2d 100, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2828, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11408, 1987 WL 2261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richemont-v-osias-fladistctapp-1987.