Richelson v. Fox

6 A.D.2d 802, 175 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5626

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal to this court from an order changing the place of trial of Action No. 5 granted, without costs, and appeal dismissed. The order appealed from was entered in Onondaga County on March 24, 1958, and a certified copy thereof was thereafter filed in Queens County. (See Rules Civ. Prac., rules 15, 147.) [803]*803The appeal should be heard in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Fourth Judicial Department. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 617.) Appellants may, if so advised, apply to the proper court for leave to amend the notice of appeal. The dismissal -.of the appeal to this court shall be without prejudice to such application. (Civ, Prac. Act, § 107; Kalish v. Belmont Motors, 280 App. Div. 824 and eases there cited; People v. Schoff, 266 App. Div. 158.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richelson v. Fox, 6 A.D.2d 802, 175 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

6 A.D.2d 802 (Richelson v. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Schoff
266 A.D. 158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)
Kalish v. Belmont Motors, Inc.
280 A.D. 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)