Richeen Prophete v. The State of Florida
This text of Richeen Prophete v. The State of Florida (Richeen Prophete v. The State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 12, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-1199 Lower Tribunal No. F02-24095 ________________
Richeen Prophete, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Maria Miranda, Judge.
Law Offices of Michelle Walsh, P.A., and Michelle Walsh, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and EMAS and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Wyatt v. State, 78 So. 3d 512, 527 (Fla. 2011) (setting
forth standard to obtain a new trial based on newly discovered evidence,
including requirement “that defendant or his counsel could not have known
[of it] by the use of diligence” (internal quotation marks omitted)) (quoting
Jones v. State, 709 So. 2d 512, 521 (Fla. 1998)); LaFlippe v. State, 49 Fla.
L. Weekly D275 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 31, 2024) (same).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richeen Prophete v. The State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richeen-prophete-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.