Richdale Development Co. v. McNeil Co.

510 N.W.2d 312, 244 Neb. 936, 1994 Neb. LEXIS 12
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 21, 1994
DocketNo. S-91-814
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 510 N.W.2d 312 (Richdale Development Co. v. McNeil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richdale Development Co. v. McNeil Co., 510 N.W.2d 312, 244 Neb. 936, 1994 Neb. LEXIS 12 (Neb. 1994).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon motion for rehearing, the motion is overruled; however, the opinion previously adopted by this court, Richdale Dev. Co. v. McNeil Co., antep. 694, 508 N.W.2d 853 (1993), is hereby modified by striking therefrom all that portion of the opinion beginning “The judgment of the district court is affirmed,” down to and including the end of the opinion. Id. at 707, 508 N.W.2d at 861. The following is substituted therefor:

The Congress having preempted forum jurisdiction as to claims involving copyright, both this court and the district court are without jurisdiction in this case. Such lack of jurisdiction may not be waived by the parties, nor need it be asserted as an affirmative defense. The cause is remanded to the district court with directions to dismiss the cause and to dissolve the existing injunction.

Remanded with directions.

White, J., participating on briefs. Shanahan, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

RICHDALE DEVELOPMENT CO. v. McNEIL COMPANY, INC.
510 N.W.2d 312 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 N.W.2d 312, 244 Neb. 936, 1994 Neb. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richdale-development-co-v-mcneil-co-neb-1994.