Richbourg v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Richbourg v. State

1930 OK CR 402, 296 P. 1117, 50 Okla. Crim. 134, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 407

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided September 13, 1930·No. No. A-7665.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of McCurtain county on a charge of manufacturing whisky, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

*135 The case was tried in July, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in November, 1929. No- briefs in support of the appeajl have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

We have examined the record, and the evidence is sufficient from which the jury might reasonably and logically find the defendant guilty.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of McCurtain county on a charge of manufacturing whisky, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

*135 The case was tried in July, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in November, 1929. No- briefs in support of the appeajl have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

We have examined the record, and the evidence is sufficient from which the jury might reasonably and logically find the defendant guilty.

The case is affirmed.

Richbourg v. State, 1930 OK CR 402, 296 P. 1117, 50 Okla. Crim. 134, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 407 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK CR 402 (Richbourg v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.