Richbourg v. Richbourg
This text of 5 S.C. Eq. 168 (Richbourg v. Richbourg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the decree of the Covrt„
The fact of the insolvency of North Si Hogg, was well known to the appellant at the time the note was placed in the hands of Wright, and the authority rested in him to do. the best he could with it, discharged him from the strict duties of an attorney, and constituted him a general agent accountable only for culpable neglect. Any attempt -therefore, on the part of Ligón to make him responsible was inequitable and fraudulent, and gave this court original jurisdiction of the-case. It is therefore, ordered and decreed that the decree Of the circuit judge he affirmed;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 S.C. Eq. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richbourg-v-richbourg-scctapp-1824.