Richbell v. Richbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Richbell v. Richbell

272 A.D.2d 224, 707 N.Y.S.2d 624, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5915

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 224 (Richbell v. Richbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richbell v. Richbell, 272 A.D.2d 224, 707 N.Y.S.2d 624, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx [225]*225County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered September 9, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs representations as to the difficulties he had finding a new attorney after his first attorney retired from the practice of law suffice to excuse his nonappearance at the pretrial conference, and the nine months it then took for him to move to restore the action to the calendar. Defendant shows no prejudice attributable to this nine-month delay. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx [225]*225County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered September 9, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs representations as to the difficulties he had finding a new attorney after his first attorney retired from the practice of law suffice to excuse his nonappearance at the pretrial conference, and the nine months it then took for him to move to restore the action to the calendar. Defendant shows no prejudice attributable to this nine-month delay. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 224, 707 N.Y.S.2d 624, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richbell-v-richbell-nyappdiv-2000.