Richardson Vs. Cabada
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
PETER RICHARDSON, AN No. 81650 INDIVIDUAL, Appellant, vs. FILE OSCAR CABADA, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND JOSE ALBERTO CABADA- SEP 2 4 2020 OROZCO, AN INDIVIDUAL, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
Res • ondents. BY 6 •\1 DPirlyei
c K
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This appeal was docketed on August 19, 2020, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 10 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2).
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge Drummond Law Firm Bauman Loewe Witt & Maxwell, PLLC/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
4diakia .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
472 P.3d 681 (Richardson Vs. Cabada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.