Richardson v. Young

Fourth Circuit

Richardson v. Young

26 F. App'x 376

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2002·No. No. 01-7659·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dwight Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. Young, No. CA-00-2457-L (D.Md. Sept. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dwight Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. Young, No. CA-00-2457-L (D.Md. Sept. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Richardson v. Young, 26 F. App'x 376 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

26 F. App'x 376 (Richardson v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related