Richardson v. Wheeler

Fourth Circuit

Richardson v. Wheeler

74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39052, 1996 WL 13983

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 16, 1996

Docket95-7187

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1233 (Richardson v. Wheeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Wheeler, 74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39052, 1996 WL 13983 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

74 F.3d 1233
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bernard Ray RICHARDSON, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Barbara J. WHEELER; R.K. White; David K. Smith; Bobby W.
Soles; James Keeling; Eleanor L. Stockdale; L.W. Huffman;
Captain Barksdale; Commonwealth Of Virginia; Counselor
Spicer; Michael A. Shupe, Grievance Coordinator,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7187.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 16, 1996.

Bernard Ray Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. Wheeler, No. CA-93-872-R (W.D.Va. July 10, 1995; Oct. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

In light of this disposition, Richardson's motions for discovery and for appointment of counsel are hereby denied

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1233
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bernard Ray RICHARDSON, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Barbara J. WHEELER; R.K. White; David K. Smith; Bobby W.
Soles; James Keeling; Eleanor L. Stockdale; L.W. Huffman;
Captain Barksdale; Commonwealth Of Virginia; Counselor
Spicer; Michael A. Shupe, Grievance Coordinator,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7187.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 16, 1996.

Bernard Ray Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. Wheeler, No. CA-93-872-R (W.D.Va. July 10, 1995; Oct. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

In light of this disposition, Richardson's motions for discovery and for appointment of counsel are hereby denied

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39052, 1996 WL 13983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-wheeler-ca4-1996.