Richardson v. Wengatz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Richardson v. Wengatz

33 A.D.2d 947, 306 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5684

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1970

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 33 A.D.2d 947 (Richardson v. Wengatz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Wengatz, 33 A.D.2d 947, 306 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Greenblott, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered February 2,1967 in Columbia County, which denied defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint. This action was commenced to recover damages for injuries sustained by the respondent Catherine Richardson, and for loss of services and medical expenses incurred by her husband, Frank Richardson, when she allegedly slipped and fell while descending a stairway in appellants’ home. After the jury reported that it was unable to reach a verdict, a mistrial was granted. The instant order is not appealable. In view of the jury disagreement and mistrial, denials of the appellants’ oral motions to dismiss, one made at the close of respondents’ case, and renewed both at the close of the entire case and after the jury failed to reach a verdict, are part of the rulings made during the course of trial and not appealable. (Covell v. H. JR. H. Constr. Corp., 17 N Y 2d 709, affg. 24 A D 2d 566; Tannenbaum v. Hoar, 26 A D 2d 980.) The result might be otherwise if the motion were made upon notice. (7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 5701.19.) Appeal dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Greenblott, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenblott, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered February 2,1967 in Columbia County, which denied defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint. This action was commenced to recover damages for injuries sustained by the respondent Catherine Richardson, and for loss of services and medical expenses incurred by her husband, Frank Richardson, when she allegedly slipped and fell while descending a stairway in appellants’ home. After the jury reported that it was unable to reach a verdict, a mistrial was granted. The instant order is not appealable. In view of the jury disagreement and mistrial, denials of the appellants’ oral motions to dismiss, one made at the close of respondents’ case, and renewed both at the close of the entire case and after the jury failed to reach a verdict, are part of the rulings made during the course of trial and not appealable. (Covell v. H. JR. H. Constr. Corp., 17 N Y 2d 709, affg. 24 A D 2d 566; Tannenbaum v. Hoar, 26 A D 2d 980.) The result might be otherwise if the motion were made upon notice. (7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 5701.19.) Appeal dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Greenblott, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 947, 306 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-wengatz-nyappdiv-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack