Richardson v. Virginia Department of Corrections

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 2009
Docket09-6248
StatusUnpublished

This text of Richardson v. Virginia Department of Corrections (Richardson v. Virginia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. Virginia Department of Corrections, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6248

GREGORY A. RICHARDSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; WARDEN OF SUSSEX I STATE PRISON,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00514-REP)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory A. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregory A. Richardson appeals the district court’s

order imposing a pre-filing injunction because of his frequent

and frivolous legal actions. See Richardson v. Virginia Dep’t

of Corr., No. 3:07-cv-00514-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 8, 2009). We

have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion in the

district court’s order. See In re Burnley, 988 F.2d 1, 3-4 (4th

Cir. 1992) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we

affirm and deny as moot Richardson’s motion for bail or release

pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re John Rodgers Burnley
988 F.2d 1 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Richardson v. Virginia Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-virginia-department-of-corrections-ca4-2009.