Richardson v. Tricom Pictures & Productions, Inc.

183 F. App'x 872

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: June 8, 2006
• Docket: No. 05-11421
• Status: Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After reviewing the parties’ briefs, the record, and the relevant case law, we conclude the district court did not err when it denied Appellant’s Rule 50(b) renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law.

AFFIRMED.