Richardson v. Stovall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Richardson v. Stovall

57 Ala. 422

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1876·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

STONE, J.

Section 2704 of Revised Code, (since amend- • ed, Pamph. Acts 1874-5, p. 252), to the extent that section-goes, necessarily repeals section 3218, Revised Code. Being - a party, or interested in the suit, except as provided in said section 2704, is now no disqualification to testify in any civil, suit.—Padget v. Padget, 41 Ala. 382; Walthall v. Walthall, 42 Ala. 450; Brand v. Abbott, id. 499; Eliton v. Wyley, id. 640.

No error in the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STONE, J.

Section 2704 of Revised Code, (since amend- • ed, Pamph. Acts 1874-5, p. 252), to the extent that section-goes, necessarily repeals section 3218, Revised Code. Being - a party, or interested in the suit, except as provided in said section 2704, is now no disqualification to testify in any civil, suit.—Padget v. Padget, 41 Ala. 382; Walthall v. Walthall, 42 Ala. 450; Brand v. Abbott, id. 499; Eliton v. Wyley, id. 640.

No error in the record.

Affirmed.

Richardson v. Stovall, 57 Ala. 422 (Ala. 1876).

Pincite

57 Ala. 422 (Richardson v. Stovall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related