Richardson v. Stovall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Richardson v. Stovall

57 Ala. 422

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedDecember 15, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 Ala. 422 (Richardson v. Stovall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. Stovall, 57 Ala. 422 (Ala. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

STONE, J.

Section 2704 of Revised Code, (since amend- • ed, Pamph. Acts 1874-5, p. 252), to the extent that section-goes, necessarily repeals section 3218, Revised Code. Being - a party, or interested in the suit, except as provided in said section 2704, is now no disqualification to testify in any civil, suit.—Padget v. Padget, 41 Ala. 382; Walthall v. Walthall, 42 Ala. 450; Brand v. Abbott, id. 499; Eliton v. Wyley, id. 640.

No error in the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STONE, J.

Section 2704 of Revised Code, (since amend- • ed, Pamph. Acts 1874-5, p. 252), to the extent that section-goes, necessarily repeals section 3218, Revised Code. Being - a party, or interested in the suit, except as provided in said section 2704, is now no disqualification to testify in any civil, suit.—Padget v. Padget, 41 Ala. 382; Walthall v. Walthall, 42 Ala. 450; Brand v. Abbott, id. 499; Eliton v. Wyley, id. 640.

No error in the record.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Ala. 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-stovall-ala-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack