Richardson v. State
179 S.W. 1185, 78 Tex. Crim. 81, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 195
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 Tex. Crim. 111 →
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquors in prohibition territory, and his punishment assessed at one year confinement in the State penitentiary.
No exceptions were reserved to the introduction of any testimony, nor to the charge of the court as given. No special charge was requested. So the only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the testimony. Tom Kirkwood testified he secured a bottle of whisky from .appellant and paid him a dollar for it.
The judgment is affirmed. ■ Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richardson v. State, 179 S.W. 1185, 78 Tex. Crim. 81, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 195 (Tex. 1915).
179 S.W. 1185 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.