Richardson v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Richardson v. State

774 S.E.2d 304, 368 N.C. 158, 2015 N.C. LEXIS 654

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 23, 2015·No. No. 384A14·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in Hart v. State, _ N.C. _, _, _ S.E.2d _, _ (2015) (372A14), the decision of the trial court is reversed.

REVERSED.

Justice HUDSON, Justice BEASLEY, and Justice ERVIN dissent for the reasons stated in Justice Hudson’s dissenting opinion in Hart v. State, _ N.C. _, _, _ S.E.2d _, _ (2015) (372A14). Justice BEASLEY also dissents for the reasons stated in her dissenting opinion in Hart v. State, id. at _, _ S.E.2d at _.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in Hart v. State, _ N.C. _, _, _ S.E.2d _, _ (2015) (372A14), the decision of the trial court is reversed.

REVERSED.

Justice HUDSON, Justice BEASLEY, and Justice ERVIN dissent for the reasons stated in Justice Hudson’s dissenting opinion in Hart v. State, _ N.C. _, _, _ S.E.2d _, _ (2015) (372A14). Justice BEASLEY also dissents for the reasons stated in her dissenting opinion in Hart v. State, id. at _, _ S.E.2d at _.

Richardson v. State, 774 S.E.2d 304, 368 N.C. 158, 2015 N.C. LEXIS 654 (N.C. 2015).

Pincite

774 S.E.2d 304 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.