Richardson v. State

79 Miss. 289
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 79 Miss. 289 (Richardson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. State, 79 Miss. 289 (Mich. 1901).

Opinion

CalhooN, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The indictment is good enough. It charges with sufficient certainty that the injury was caused by the discharge of the weapon. The word ‘ necessary ’ ’ before the word ‘ ‘ self-defense ” is not essential, since the statute (code § 969) does not require it. The previous acquittal on an indictment for an assault and battery with intent to kill and murder is no bar to this indictment for pointing a gun, etc. Granted that it would have been a bar if the previous acquittal had been on a charge of murder or manslaughter, this would have been because of the express provision of code, § 969, and it does not apply to assault and battery.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thornhill
171 So. 2d 308 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Conwill v. State
86 So. 876 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 Miss. 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-state-miss-1901.