Richardson v. State

209 S.E.2d 29, 132 Ga. App. 754, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1811
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 27, 1974
Docket49532
StatusPublished

This text of 209 S.E.2d 29 (Richardson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. State, 209 S.E.2d 29, 132 Ga. App. 754, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1811 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted for the crime of escape. He was sentenced in conformity with the jury verdict to 3 years. Appeal was taken to this court. Held:

1. The first 4 enumerations of error deal principally with the question of whether the evidence supported the verdict. They are without merit. On cross examination the defendant was asked the following question: "You did escape at this time, Mr. Richardson, on July 9th, 1973, you did escape; is that correct.” The defendant answered "that’s true.”

2. Enumeration of error 5 contends that the court erred in failing to grant the defendant’s motion for severance of his trial from that of a co-defendant. The co-defendant was indicted along with the defendant for escape on the same day and from the same prison and under similar circumstances.

In Burden v. State, 131 Ga. App. 522 (206 SE2d 533), this court pointed out that under new Code § 27-2101, as amended (Ga. L. 1971, pp. 891, 892; 1972, pp. 618, 619), the trial judge has a discretion in determining whether to grant a separate trial for co-defendants. See Merrill v. State, 130 Ga. App. 745, 748 (204 SE2d 632); Mathis v. [755]*755State, 231 Ga. 401, 404 (3) (202 SE2d 73). Under the circumstances of this case, it was not an abuse of discretion to deny the defendant’s motion for severance.

Submitted July 1, 1974 Decided September 27, 1974. James H. Bone, for appellant.

3. The remaining enumerations of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Clark, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merrill v. State
204 S.E.2d 632 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Mathis v. State
202 S.E.2d 73 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Burden v. State
206 S.E.2d 533 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 S.E.2d 29, 132 Ga. App. 754, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-state-gactapp-1974.