Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Richardson v. State

Richardson v. State

188 S.E.2d 232, 125 Ga. App. 476, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1376
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 10, 1972
Docket46858
StatusPublished

This text of 188 S.E.2d 232 (Richardson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. State, 188 S.E.2d 232, 125 Ga. App. 476, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1376 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted for the offense of burglary. He then appealed to this court. Held:

1. The appellant contends that the trial judge expressed an opinion to the jury as to what a witness had testified. [477]*477However, no objection to the court’s remarks was made during the course of the trial. Frost v. State, 92 Ga. App. 614 (2) (89 SE2d 524); Pulliam v. State, 196 Ga. 782 (6) (28 SE2d 139).

Submitted January 10, 1972 Decided February 10, 1972. Johnson & Beckham, William P. Johnson, for appellant.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Hall, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frost v. State
89 S.E.2d 524 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Pulliam v. State
28 S.E.2d 139 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 S.E.2d 232, 125 Ga. App. 476, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-state-gactapp-1972.