Richardson v. State
188 S.E.2d 232, 125 Ga. App. 476, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1376
Opinion
The appellant was tried and convicted for the offense of burglary. He then appealed to this court. Held:
1. The appellant contends that the trial judge expressed an opinion to the jury as to what a witness had testified. [477] However, no objection to the court’s remarks was made during the course of the trial. Frost v. State, 92 Ga. App. 614 (2) (89 SE2d 524); Pulliam v. State, 196 Ga. 782 (6) (28 SE2d 139).
2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richardson v. State, 188 S.E.2d 232, 125 Ga. App. 476, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1376 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).
188 S.E.2d 232 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frost v. State
89 S.E.2d 524 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Pulliam v. State
28 S.E.2d 139 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)