Richardson v. State

179 S.E. 771, 51 Ga. App. 140, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 598
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 15, 1935·No. 24627·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gubrry, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder. The evidence for the State showed that the defendant, without provocation and while the prosecutor was attempting to evade her, made an unjustifiable assault- with a knife or razor upon the prosecutor from behind. The defendant through her statement justified herself under the theory of reasonable fears: Sold, that the evidence overwhelmingly supported the verdict; and the court did not err in failing to charge the jury on the doctrine of reasonable fears, without a request for such a charge, this theory being raised only by the defendant’s statement. See Hardin v. State, 107 Ga. 718 (33 S. E. 700); Parker v. State, 1 Ga. App. 781 (57 S. E. 1028); Crawford v. State, 125 Ga. 793 (54 S. E. 695); Rentfrow v. State, 123 Ga. 539 (51 S. E. 596). The other assignments of error than that dealt with above are without merit. Judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is therefore Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 179 S.E. 771, 51 Ga. App. 140, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 598 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

179 S.E. 771 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. State
22 S.E.2d 65 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)