Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Richardson v. State

Richardson v. State

108 S.E. 259, 27 Ga. App. 319, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 866
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 26, 1921
Docket12570
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 108 S.E. 259 (Richardson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. State, 108 S.E. 259, 27 Ga. App. 319, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 866 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The conviction was unauthorized by the evidence, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. H. B. Moss, Mozley & Gann, for plaintiff in error. John S. Wood, solicitor-general, Lindley W. Camp, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Giles v. State
162 S.E.2d 736 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 S.E. 259, 27 Ga. App. 319, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-state-gactapp-1921.