Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Richardson v. State

Richardson v. State

932 So. 2d 329, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2572, 2006 WL 436016
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 884 So. 2d 950 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 2006·No. No. 4D02-4985·Published

Opinion

On Remand from the Supreme Court of Florida

PER CURIAM.

In State v. Richardson, 915 So.2d 86 (Fla.2005), the supreme court quashed this court’s decision in Richardson v. State, 884 [330]*330So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), and remanded the ease for consideration of any remaining issues. We must now affirm the summary denial of all of appellant’s postconviction claims. This court reviewed all of appellant’s claims in the original proceeding and only inadvertently failed to state in our prior opinion that the claims not discussed in the opinion were reviewed and affirmed.

STEVENSON, C.J., SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 932 So. 2d 329, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2572, 2006 WL 436016 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

932 So. 2d 329 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. State
884 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
State v. Richardson
915 So. 2d 86 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)