Richardson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Richardson v. State

762 So. 2d 911, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 603, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1364, 2000 WL 889789

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 6, 2000

DocketNo. SC96764

StatusPublished

This text of 762 So. 2d 911 (Richardson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richardson v. State, 762 So. 2d 911, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 603, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1364, 2000 WL 889789 (Fla. 2000).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in Richardson v. State, 748 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), in which the Fifth District certified the same question as did the First District in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999):

DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES ' (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE . FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently approved the First District’s decision in Woods, holding that the Prisoner Releasee Reoffender Act, as properly interpreted by the First District, does not violate separation of powers, and rejecting other constitutional challenges to the Act. See State v. Cotton, Nos. SC94996 & SC95281, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 766521 (Fla. June 15, 2000) Accordingly, for the reasons expressed in Cotton, we [912]*912approve the decision of the Fifth District in this case.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ„ concur. QUINCE, J., dissents with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI