Richardson v. State

96 So. 655, 19 Ala. App. 249, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 120
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ala. App. 639
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 1923·No. 8 Div. 60.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Count 2 of the indictment, upon which defendant was convicted, charged him with unlawfully possessing a still, etc. The court pronounced judgment, and duly sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary.

The transcript contains a motion for a new trial, but no bill of exceptions, and in the absence of a bill of exceptions we cannot review the action of the court in denying the motion to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial.

As the record is free from error, the judgment appealed from must stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 96 So. 655, 19 Ala. App. 249, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 120 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

96 So. 655 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.