Richardson v. State

96 So. 655, 19 Ala. App. 249, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 120
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 29, 1923
Docket8 Div. 60.
StatusPublished

This text of 96 So. 655 (Richardson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. State, 96 So. 655, 19 Ala. App. 249, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 120 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Count 2 of the indictment, upon which defendant was convicted, charged him with unlawfully possessing a still, etc. The court pronounced judgment, and duly sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary.

The transcript contains a motion for a new trial, but no bill of exceptions, and in the absence of a bill of exceptions we cannot review the action of the court in denying the motion to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial.

As the record is free from error, the judgment appealed from must stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 655, 19 Ala. App. 249, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-state-alactapp-1923.