Richardson v. State

78 So. 717, 16 Ala. App. 454, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 138
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richardson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 Ala. App. 81
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 1918·No. 1 Div. 284.·Published

Opinion

BROWN, P. J.

After defendant’s demurrers to the complaint were overruled, he filed a plea of autrefois acquit as to the first, second, third, and fifth counts, and this plea was confessed hy the state, thus eliminating all counts of the complaint except the fourth, so if error intervened in the rulings on the demurrers, it was error without injury. As to count 4, the defendant pleadéd not guilty, was tried and convicted, and appeals on the record without a bill of exceptions.

Aside from the rulings above noted, the record appears to be in all things regular and free from error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 78 So. 717, 16 Ala. App. 454, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 138 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

78 So. 717 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.