Richardson v. State

508 So. 2d 295, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4334
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 29, 1987·No. 86-700·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our denial of the writ should not be taken as approval of the statements of the Court of Criminal Appeals, 508 So.2d 289, relating to the fact that the jury was allowed during its deliberations to consider transcribed testimony of certain witnesses.

WRIT DENIED.

JONES, SHORES, ADAMS, HOUSTON and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. State, 508 So. 2d 295, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4334 (Ala. 1987).

508 So. 2d 295 (Richardson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Latimer v. State
659 So. 2d 129 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1994)