Richardson v. State

142 Ala. 12
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 142 Ala. 12 (Richardson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. State, 142 Ala. 12 (Ala. 1904).

Opinion

SIMPSON, J.

The motion to strike the bill of excep-. tions from the files is sustained.

On November 16th 1904, the defendant was sentenced and the court granted him “until .January, 5th 1905” in which to have the bill of exceptions signed by the presiding judge.” . -'

An order was made by the court, ^yn. January 5th 1905, (in vacation) extending the'tijme “until January 6th 1905.” The words “until Jaiiuary 5th” excluded that day, and consequently the time for signing the bill of exceptions expired on the night of January 4th. — Johnson v. State, 37 So. Rep. 421; A. & M. Co. v. Marcus, 128 Ala. 355; Rosson v. State, 92 Ala. 76; Wright v. State, 136 Ala. 50; Scott v. State, 37 So. Rep. 366.

The motion to strike the bill of exceptions is sustained and the judgment of the Court is affirmed.

Affirmed..

McClellan, G. J., Tyson and Andekson, J. J., concurring. /

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Scott
167 So. 572 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)
Southern Ry. Co. v. Montgomery
157 So. 854 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934)
Jeremy Fuel & Grain Co. v. Denver & R. G. R.
203 P. 863 (Utah Supreme Court, 1921)
Oberhaus v. State ex rel. McNamara
55 So. 898 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Montgomery Traction Co. v. Knabe
48 So. 501 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 Ala. 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-state-ala-1904.