Richardson v. South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.

566 S.W.2d 779, 1978 Ky. App. LEXIS 528
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedFebruary 24, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 566 S.W.2d 779 (Richardson v. South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corp., 566 S.W.2d 779, 1978 Ky. App. LEXIS 528 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

PARK, Judge.

The defendant-appellee, South Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation (South Kentucky RECC), is a nonprofit, nonstock rural electric cooperative incorporated under the provisions of KRS 279.010 to KRS 279.220. The plaintiff-appellants are the former shareholders and liquidating agent of The J. M. Richardson Flooring and Lumber Company (Richardson Flooring), a Kentucky corporation, that was dissolved commencing in 1972. Richardson Flooring had been a customer of South Kentucky RECC for the years 1960 through 1971. In an action commenced in the Pulaski Circuit Court, the appellants sought to recover “capital credit” in the amount of $25,992.08 which had been allocated to Richardson Flooring on the books of South Kentucky RECC. The former shareholders and liquidating agent of Richardson Flooring appeal from a summary judgment granted by the circuit court dismissing the complaint.

During each of the years in question, South Kentucky RECC allocated to “patronage capital” all amounts received from the sale of electricity in excess of actual operating costs and expenses. The patronage capital was then allocated to the capital credit account of each customer of South Kentucky RECC based upon the amount billed to that customer for electric service during the year.

[781]*781In 1964, South Kentucky RECC paid the sum of $72,957.02 to retire all of the capital credits allocated to its customers for the years 1946-1949. In 1967, South Kentucky RECC paid the sum of $140,148.19 to retire the capital credits allocated to its customers for the years 1950-1954. Since that time, South Kentucky RECC has made no general retirement of capital credits. However, during the years 1962-1974, South Kentucky RECC has paid the sum of $585,-548.41 to retire the capital credits of deceased customers.

The former shareholders and liquidating agent of Richardson Flooring assert that there are two reasons why they are entitled to payment of the Richardson Flooring capital credit account of $25,992.08. First, they assert that South Kentucky RECC was under a duty to distribute all surplus revenue rather than allocating such sums to capital credits. Second, they assert that South Kentucky RECC could not retire the capital credits of deceased customers without making a pro rata redemption of the capital credits of all other customers for the years in question.

I

The appellants rely upon subsection (3) of KRS 279.160, which provided:

Revenue not needed for the purposes mentioned in subsection (2) of this section shall be returned to the members as a patronage dividend or refund on a pro rata basis according to the amount of electric energy consumed, services rendered or personal property received, rented or purchased. The patronage dividend or refund shall be payable either in cash, common stock, certificates of indebtedness or other property, or in abatement of current charges for electric energy, services or personal property, or both, or in general rate reductions, as the board of directors may determine.

The appellants claim that capital credits do not constitute a legal method of paying patronage dividends or refunds pursuant to KRS 279.160(3). They further assert that the rights of Richardson Flooring to the capital accounts accrued prior to the repeal of KRS 279.160 in 1972. (1972 Ky. Acts, ch. 11, § 6).

The appellants assume that all amounts received by South Kentucky RECC for furnishing electric energy in excess of actual operating costs and expenses constituted surplus revenue not needed for the purposes mentioned in subsection (2) of KRS 279.160. If this assumption were correct, there would be serious question whether South Kentucky RECC could retain such sums as capital credits rather than paying them on a pro rata basis to its customers as a patronage dividend or refund. However, subsection (2) of KRS 279.160 provided that the charges made by the cooperative should produce revenue for purposes other than the actual operating costs and expenses of the cooperative. Subsection (2) of KRS 279.160 provided that the charges made by South Kentucky RECC should be fixed so as to produce sufficient revenue for the following purposes:

(a) To pay all legal and other necessary expenses incident to the operation of its system and business, including maintenance cost, operating charges, upkeep, repairs and taxes.
(b) To provide a sinking fund for the liquidation of the principal and interest of obligations and to provide a reasonable surplus in the discretion of the board of directors.
(c) To provide adequate funds to be used as working capital and to acquire property necessary or incidental to the proper conduct of the business of the corporation, and funds for making improvements, extensions and replacements, including the replacement of merchandise and personal property sold in the usual course of business, and to provide for depreciation and contingencies.
(d) To provide other funds needed for the proper conduct of the business.
(e) To maintain the property of the corporation in a sound physical and financial condition to render adequate and efficient service.

[782]*782In its official notice of the amount of capital credit allocated to each customer, South Kentucky RECC stated:

Patronage capital is the amount billed for services above the actual operating costs and expenses of that service. These amounts are allocated to each consumer based upon the amount billed for electric service.
This patronage capital is used by your cooperative reducing its indebtedness, on its R.E.A. and C.F.C. loans and other proper purposes. It is, in effect, invested in poles, wires, transformers, sub-stations and other property owned by the cooperative. Without this security of invested ownership, no financing organization would be willing to risk loans of capital to it. That is why the capital credits are put into the electric plant in your behalf, and why they are not being refunded at this time. When it is economically feasible within sound business policy to refund capital credits, they will be retired in the order of the year in which they have accumulated.

It is apparent that the amounts being retained by the cooperative as capital credits were for the purposes authorized by subsection (2) of KRS 279.160.

Under subsection (2) of KRS 279.-160

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchellville Cooperative v. Indian Creek Corp.
469 N.W.2d 258 (Court of Appeals of Iowa, 1991)
Schill v. Langdon Farmers Union Oil Co.
442 N.W.2d 408 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
566 S.W.2d 779, 1978 Ky. App. LEXIS 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-south-kentucky-rural-electric-cooperative-corp-kyctapp-1978.