Richardson v. Solis

442 F. App'x 576
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedDecember 16, 2011
DocketNo. 11-5013
StatusPublished

This text of 442 F. App'x 576 (Richardson v. Solis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richardson v. Solis, 442 F. App'x 576 (D.C. Cir. 2011).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed December 22, 2010, be affirmed. The district court correctly determined appellant’s claims are barred by res judicata. See Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94, 101 S.Ct. 411, 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980) (res judicata precludes relitigating claims that were or could have been raised in a previous action).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allen v. McCurry
449 U.S. 90 (Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 F. App'x 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardson-v-solis-cadc-2011.