Richardson v. Sisk

Fourth Circuit

Richardson v. Sisk

300 F. App'x 216

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 19, 2008·No. Nos. 08-6050, 08-6769·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gregory A. Richardson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) for failure to pay his filing fee, and the order denying his motion to reconsider under Fed.R.CivJP. 60(b). We have reviewed the orders and record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Richardson v. Sisk, No. 3:07-cv00488-REP (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 2007; Apr. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gregory A. Richardson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) for failure to pay his filing fee, and the order denying his motion to reconsider under Fed.R.CivJP. 60(b). We have reviewed the orders and record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Richardson v. Sisk, No. 3:07-cv00488-REP (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 2007; Apr. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Richardson v. Sisk, 300 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

300 F. App'x 216 (Richardson v. Sisk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related