Richardson v. Rosyln Children Center

126 F. App'x 99
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 13, 2005·No. Nos. 04-2306, 9402568·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Lenir Richardson appeals a district court order dismissing as frivolous some of her claims and some of the defendants under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) and a district court order dismissing the remainder of her complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. In No. 04-2306, we review the district court’s dismissal de novo. We have reviewed the record and find the district court properly dismissed some claims and some defendants as frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as frivolous. In No. 04-2568, we have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Richardson v. Roslyn Children Center, No. CA-04-867 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 17, 2004; entered Nov. 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 04-2306 DISMISSED

No. 04-2568 AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson v. Rosyln Children Center, 126 F. App'x 99 (4th Cir. 2005).

126 F. App'x 99 (Richardson v. Rosyln Children Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Firewalker-Fields v. Clarke
E.D. Virginia, 2021